An illusion to Celebrate Uncle Sam's Birthday

Uncle Sam’s eyes and finger seem to be pointed directly at you, no matter your viewing angle

Uncle Sam needs YOU! James Montgomery Flagg.

Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The following text is partially reprinted from the 2016 Scientific American Mind’s special issue on illusions.  

On Uncle Sam’s 242nd birthday, here’s an oldie but goodie, which we have featured in our previous writings about face illusions.

In this image, painted by the artist and illustrator James Montgomery Flagg and depicted in World War I recruiting posters, Uncle Sam’s eyes and finger seem to be pointed directly at you, no matter your viewing angle. You can experience the same kind of illusion when you look at portraits in an art museum, and their painted eyes appear to follow you as you walk.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A 2004 study by vision scientists Jan Koenderink, Andrea van Doorn and Astrid Kappers, then at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, and James Todd of Ohio State University, concluded that, contrary to popular belief, this captivating illusion does not require special artistic talent from the painter. Instead, all that is required is that the subject of the portrait looks straight ahead, and the observer’s visual system takes care of the rest. The deceptively simple explanation is that when we look at a real human face (or any other object) in our three-dimensional physical world, the visual information that specifies near and far points changes with our viewing angle. But when we observe a two-dimensional painting or photograph hanging on the wall or a poster such as Uncle Sam’s depiction here, the visual information that defines near and far points remains unaltered by our viewing angle. The brain interprets this information as if it pertained to a 3-D object, however. That interpretation is what creates the eerie sensation that a portrait’s eyes are following you.

Here is another couple of illusions to celebrate the holiday. Enjoy the fireworks!

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe