June 7, 2020

Not the End of the Chase

The illusion game is still afoot

By Susana Martinez-Conde and Stephen L. Macknik

Marcos Lainez, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

In March 13, 2013, we wrote our first Illusion Chasers blog post for the Scientific American blog network, which we titled “Let the Chase Begin.” Seven years and hundreds of posts later, our blogging for Scientific American comes to an end, as the blog network closes down tomorrow.

Yet, the illusion chase goes on.

Our collaboration with Scientific American started years before our first blog post, and we are delighted to share that it will continue beyond our last one. We started writing for Scientific American in 2007, when we contributed an article describing some of our research for the print magazine—and were thrilled to learn that it was featured on the cover! Over the years, we have written many articles for both the digital and print magazines, including Scientific American and Scientific American Mind, and hope to continue to do so in the future.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Our bimonthly Illusions column, which we started writing in 2011, lives on in Scientific American Mind. We invite you to keep reading it to stay on top of the latest developments in the science and art of illusion.

Mente y Cerebro magazine will also continue to publish our other column on matters of misperception, Delusions, as well as its Spanish-language counterpart, Ilusiones.

The Best Illusion of the Year Contest, which we started hosting in 2005, carries on too. Make sure to check its archives for the Top Ten finalists of each annual contest (150 illusions to date and counting) and subscribe to its mailing list for updates on the best illusions of the year.

You can also look for our latest research discoveries in Susana’s and Steve’s labs websites and find us on twitter: @stephen_macknik and @SMartinezConde. We hope you’ll stay in touch!

So we’re not saying goodbye, but still we have a farewell treat for you: a selection of eyebombing illusions by artist Vanyu Krastev, to accompany our latest Illusionsarticle on the topic—and to tell you that we will see you soon.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American