Our nation's history is littered with shameful secrets, such as sexist chemistry sets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That's the main thing I took away from the inaugural episode of the new show WIRED Science. But don't take my word for it -- intrepid gumshoe Adam Rogers visited the Chemical Heritage Foundation in Philadelphia, home of the world's largest chemistry set collection in order to get the straight dope. Let the kits speak for themselves: God forbid the girls should ascend to the rank of actual chemist. Another thing I learned from Wired Science is that Chris Hardwick is no Alan Alda. Chris, better known as the former host of MTV's Singled Out, had the kind of flat, glassy-eyed delivery that suggested to me that all he really wanted to do was end every sentence with "dorkus!" (As in, that's what he was accusing the audience of being. Nevermind.) I just didn't buy that he was actually interested in anything other than avoiding making VH1's The Surreal Life the next stop on his television career. The rest of the show was remarkably true to the print version of WIRED, right down to the fireside chat with, not a scientist, but a venture capitalist who invests in scientists. If you're a techno-utopian libertarian, or you just enjoy seeing TV personalities panic after being covered in life-threatening quantities of Uranium dust, this one's for you.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe