Premature babies more likely among depressed moms-to-be

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Pregnant women with symptoms of depression are twice as likely to deliver their babies early as those who don't show signs of sadness, new research shows.
 
The findings reflect two troubling trends: preterm delivery is the leading cause of infant illness and death in the U.S., and more than 40 percent of pregnant women report depressive symptoms, according to the study in today's Human Reproduction.

“It’s a severely under-diagnosed area frequently being dismissed just as having the blues of being pregnant,” says study author De-Kun Li, a reproductive and perinatal epidemiologist in the division of research at Kaiser Permanente, a nationwide health insurer. “If just by controlling depression we can reduce preterm delivery, that will be very significant.”

Kaiser scientists asked 791 pregnant women if they had suffered symptoms of depression during their first trimester. Of the 40 percent who said they had, 9 percent with severe symptoms and 6 percent with mild signs gave birth prematurely. Just 4 percent of those reporting no such symptoms delivered early.

Scientists disagree over the safety of taking antidepressants during pregnancy; just 1.5 percent of the women in the new study were using the drugs to control their blues – too few to determine whether the meds affected their deliveries, Li says. Other research has shown an increase in early deliveries among women taking antidepressants, but it’s unclear whether the medications themselves or the underlying depression were the cause. There is some evidence that the meds increase the risk of low birth weight; a 1999 review found no higher risk of birth defects or behavioral problems in children born to women who took the drugs, but more recent studies have found some rare heart defects.

“Depression during pregnancy needs to be paid attention to and brought to the forefront of prenatal care,” Li says, “but the treatment doesn’t have to be medication. The safety of antidepressants during pregnancy is still an unsettled question. For minor [depression], all they probably need is to be getting emotional and physical support from their spouse and family.”

(Image by iStockphoto/Sharon Dominick)

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe