This week in censoring scientific discourse via the legal system, Harun Yahya edition

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A good way to convince people your opponents are wrong is to put a red 'X' through a cheesy and outdated depiction of one of their central hypotheses--and then write FALSE next to it. (image from Harun Yahya's Atlas of Creation) Unbelievable -- it's now officially a trend. While we were busy breaking the story that Stuart Pivar is using the courts to pursue one of America's most-read science blogs, Harun Yahya (the pen name of Adnan Oktar), Turkish millionaire and conspicuous creationist, managed to get all of Wordpress.com blocked in Turkey because of comments he didn't like that appeared on blogs hosted by that site. (Thanks for the tip, Adamant / Russel Seitz!) Wordpress.com is the fourth biggest blog hosting site on the internet, and is home to more than 1 million blogs. According to the founding developer of Wordpress, Matt Mullenweg, his site was doing more than 12 million pageviews a month in Turkey -- in other words, a large, thriving citizen-journalist community has been completely cut off because of the ego of a single wealthy creationist. Yahya / Oktar claims that some of what was said about him on Wordpress.com hosted blogs was slander. I don't know how the laws work in Turkey, but in the U.S., the procedure for addressing such claims differs somewhat from the tactics Yahya employed: getting the government to use its central firewall for censorship. This is a man whose magnum opus -- the Atlas of Creation -- asserts that no evolution has actually taken place since the dawn of time. He cites as evidence the many fossils that resemble modern forms -- this is an easy enough trick when you're dealing with the coelacanth or the crayfish, both of which are 'living fossils' -- but doesn't works so well when you get to primates. But of course Adnan has an answer: on page 642 of his book, Yahya declares A. Afarensis to be merely "an ordinary ape species." On page 589 of the same text, Yahya captions an image of the burning twin towers with this bon mot:

No matter what ideology they may espouse, those who perpetrate terror all over the world are, in reality, Darwnists. Darwinism is the only philosophy that places a value on--and thus encourages--conflict.
Yes, Mr. Yahya, and war is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. And please, stop sending review copies of Atlas of Creation to our offices -- we get enough crank letters as it is. via Adamant

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe