Weaponized BlackBerry

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


credit: Lyric Rosatti When scientists and science-fiction writers think about the unintended consequences of new technology, they tend to obsess about the far-out what-ifs: "What if the internet turns us into a world of shut-ins? What if nuclear terrorism neutralizes our military advantage?" That's why people who worry over the effects of rapid technological change in the field of wireless communications ("What if the disintermediating effects of digital communication render us unable to effect face-to-face communication?") would never have anticipated something so mundane as this:

Rabid-tempered rapper Foxy Brown is in trouble again after allegedly smashing a BlackBerry into her Brooklyn neighbor's face, officials said yesterday.
...
Raymond told cops she was walking home from work July 30 when Foxy hurled a BlackBerry at her.
Nice to know that 100,000 years of human history (not to mention billions of dollars worth of R & D on the part of Research in Motion) has done little to change our innate tendency to hurl small, hard objects. Here I defer to Richard W. Young of UCLA Medical School:
It has been proposed that the hominid lineage began when a group of chimpanzee-like apes began to throw rocks and swing clubs at adversaries, and that this behaviour yielded reproductive advantages for millions of years, driving natural selection for improved throwing and clubbing prowess.

This assertion leads to the prediction that the human hand should be adapted for throwing and clubbing, a topic that is explored in the following report.

It is shown that the two fundamental human handgrips, first identified by J. R. Napier, and named by him the 'precision grip' and 'power grip', represent a throwing grip and a clubbing grip, thereby providing an evolutionary explanation for the two unique grips, and the extensive anatomical remodelling of the hand that made them possible. These results are supported by palaeoanthropological evidence.
Of course, this isn't the first time a Blackberry has been confused with a weapon. >> New rap for diva rapper | The Daily News >> Evolution of the human hand: the role of throwing and clubbing | Journal of Anatomy

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe