How Can We Reverse the Decline in Breast Cancer Screening?

Making it more convenient and less painful would be a great start

Breast cancer cells.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Although National Breast Cancer Awareness Month started in 1985, more than three decades ago, some women are still not getting mammograms when they should.

Reports in recent years showing a decline in the number of women receiving mammograms are especially concerning when you consider a woman in the United States has a one-in-eight risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer over the course of her lifetime.

What is holding women back from getting this important screening? We know skipping mammograms can lead to missed cancers. In fact, even for women age 50 or older, skipping a mammogram every other year may result in up to 30 percent of cancers being undetected.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We also understand the critical role annual screenings play in detecting breast cancer at an earlier stage, when treatment is more likely to be successful. Statistics show mammography has helped reduce breast cancer mortality in the U.S. by nearly 40 percent since 1990. Further, technological advances in mammography systems—such as digital breast tomosynthesis, otherwise known as 3-D mammography—have improved screening accuracy so patients are able to be treated earlier and more precisely.

While the reasons women may not be getting mammograms are certainly varied and complex, a new national survey points to the discomfort, pain and stress associated with these screenings as important factors. The survey, which was commissioned by Siemens Healthineers and conducted by HealthyWomen, featured responses from 1,194 women 40 and older regarding their experiences with and perceptions of mammograms.

The survey found that one of the top three reasons women have not yet obtained a mammogram is due to being “worried it will hurt.” For the approximately 10 percent of respondents who stopped receiving mammograms on an annual or bi-annual basis, 32 percent cited unpleasant and/or painful past experiences as a deterrent. Also interesting: 46 percent of women who have not yet been screened report they “haven’t gotten around to it,” which points to a potential lack of convenience in obtaining a mammogram.

Many may think that the discomfort and inconvenience associated with mammograms is a given, and that women just have to “put up with it” in the best interest of their health. Women, health advocates, and health care professionals take note: not all mammography experiences need be the same.

Experiences and facilities can be designed to accommodate and provide personalized care to help health care professionals meet their patients’ needs. For example, to better accommodate patients, health care professionals can increase access and convenience by offering screenings within the same facility (versus referring to an outside radiologist) and also by offering quick results reporting, patient portals and extended office hours. Physician offices can also differentiate their services by offering mammography systems that personalize compression to the patient.

The bottom line is that women and their health advocates, clinicians and industry all have a role to play in addressing the needs and concerns women have about this important test. In our role as manufacturers, we must continue to advance breast screening technology so that health care professionals can provide the best possible care—and peace of mind—to their female patients.

Pam Cumming is director of women's health at Siemens Healthineers. One of her projects has been to ensure that women's mammography needs are at least in part met with comfortable and tailored care. One of the systems Cumming oversees is the MAMMOMAT Revelation, which offers personalized soft compression (so technicians are able to apply only as much compression as is needed to obtain optimal imaging results), soft paddles and even mood lighting.

More by Pam Cumming

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe