How to Become a Scientist Communicator

Opportunities are everywhere, and training opens the way

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Recently, I attended a multiday science communication workshop at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign aimed at graduate students and postdocs. At the end, after 25 intense hours, we had learned the art of writing and presenting our science as a TED-style talk and in a radio interview format.

The workshop culminated with participants sharing their research in 90-second elevator pitch presentations. As I listened to one student and postdoc, after another, I could not help but appreciate the difference training can have on improving the ability of scientists to communicate with the public. The topics they covered ranged from materials science to quantum computing to additive manufacturing—and they were able to present complex research in short, digestible soundbites.

It is encouraging, to see the rising appreciation for science communication by graduate students in universities and professional societies. Workshops at Stanford University and at a meeting of the Materials Research Society are good examples. ComSciCon also has several science communication workshops lined up for 2019 at different regions including Atlanta, Houston, and Michigan.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Perhaps the bigger question to ponder is: how do we ensure newly trained science communicators have opportunities to share that what they have learned?

The truth is that the demands of science and graduate school can quickly weigh down on newly trained students. Without platforms to practice that what they have learned, many can get rusty, and the skills acquired at these workshops lost.

Of course, continuing to grow as a science communicator depends on participants’ goals and what they want to make out of this new field. Regardless, here are some options to consider.

First, they can reach out to their respective departments, colleges, schools or even graduate school to find out what support can be provided to them. Schools, for example, can organize workshops where alumni have the opportunity to train their peers.

Alternatively, universities can offer them opportunities to co-write press releases and department blogs. What is more, if institutions have local radio stations, they can provide them with the opportunity to present.

Conversely, because many students also belong to professional societies, they can propose to organize symposiums at the annual meeting. For example, as an entomologist, I belong to the Entomological Society of America, where I have the opportunity to propose organizing a member symposium or program workshop. Doing so creates a valuable opportunity to refresh, learn more and share.

At the same time, newbies can look for other enthusiasts on social media using common hashtags, such as #scicomm and #phdlife. Through social media, they can learn about other opportunities to grow their public engagement skills.

Outreach activities can also allow newly trained communicators to build their passion. Many departments have outreach events. Moreover, students can also be creative and find newer venues to engage the public with science. For example, a University of Missouri–St. Louis biology PhD student is using the local brewery as a venue for students to share their science.

Importantly, workshop alumni can look for internships. This would give them the chance to explore and practice in real life while spreading scientific knowledge to different audiences. Thankfully, there are useful lists out there.

Ultimately, sustaining scientists’ interest in sharing their research to a wider public will depend on availing opportunities and resources to allow them to expand their knowledge and skills. Institutions must strive to provide these venues. The time is ripe

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe