When the Moon Was a Monster

Some 70 years before the Apollo 11 landing, a malevolent natural satellite first landed on the big screen

Screenshot from  La Lune à un Mètre,  1898

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Fifty years ago this week, an estimated 600 million people sat transfixed, wreathed in the glow of cathode-ray tubes, as Neil Armstrong and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin walked on the surface of the moon. It was one of the world’s first global media events.

But 71 years before that auspicious moment in science (and video) history, one Frenchman used screen magic to bring a dark, strange vision of the moon as close to viewers as the Apollo 11 crew would later bring the world to the actual thing.

In 1898 Georges Méliès released La Lune à un Mètre, or The Moon at a Meter (also known as The Astronomer’s Dream). At the time, film, as a medium, was a newborn.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The short movie teems with fairy-tale visions of angels and demons. A maleficent moon invades the screen, intent on chewing up and spitting out the wizened Astronomer. It’s a visual fever dream of mythology mixed with science, and it seems to show how desperately we yearned to touch the lunar surface—and how greatly the reality of that mysterious celestial body could terrify us.

It’s important to keep a little motion picture history in mind: Eadweard Muybridge’s Sallie Gardner at a Gallop (one of the world’s earliest moving pictures, and probably the equivalent of the world’s first animated GIF) was only published in 1878. And several inventors, including Thomas Edison, worked to make movie cameras of various designs between the1880s and 1890s. The Lumière brothers Auguste and Louis Lumière created one of the first movie theaters, where the public could view their films on a (relatively) big screen, in Paris in 1895.

Méliès’s part in all this was to imbue the fledgling medium of cinematography with sleight-of-camera magic tricks. He created some of the world’s first special effects and employed stop-motion, time-lapse and substitution techniques that are still being used, albeit in vastly more digitally intensive ways, in Hollywood today.

Méliès quickly built on the complexity of the effects shown in La Lune à un Mètre. Four years after it was released, he created his best-known film: Le Voyage dans la Lune, or The Voyage to the Moon. (If you haven’t seen the film, you’ve probably seen its most iconic image—the man in the moon with a rocket in his eye—somewhere out there in the cultural ether.)

Credit: A screen capture sequence from Le Voyage dans la Lune, 1902

In just four years, Méliès managed to bring the moon to the viewer and the viewer to the moon. Little did he know, at the time of his death in 1938, that a mere three decades later, humanity would actually make it to the place his mind had only imagined.

Jeffery DelViscio is currently chief multimedia editor/executive producer at Scientific American. He is former director of multimedia at STAT, where he oversaw all visual, audio and interactive journalism. Before that he spent more than eight years at the New York Times, where he worked on five different desks across the paper. He holds dual master's degrees in journalism and in Earth and environmental sciences from Columbia University. He has worked onboard oceanographic research vessels and tracked money and politics in science from Washington, D.C. He was a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018. His work has won numerous awards, including two News and Documentary Emmy Awards.

More by Jeffery DelViscio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe