Working overtime: Good for the wallet, but bad for the heart

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Working overtime increases your risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), according to a report published May 12 in the European Heart Journal.

Using data from a study called Whitehall II, which followed 6,014 British civil servants for an average of 11 years between 1991 and 2004, researchers examined the risk of CHD in people who did not work overtime compared to their workaholic office-mates. Those who worked three hours or more extra per day had a 56 percent higher risk of heart-related problems, including angina (chest pain resulting from a temporary lack of blood to the heart) and heart attacks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Our findings suggest a link between working long hours and increased CHD risk, but more research is needed before we can be confident that overtime work would cause CHD," said lead author Marianna Virtanen, from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, in a prepared statement. The link was independent of several better-known risky behaviors such as smoking, being overweight, having high cholesterol or having a type A personality.

"One plausible explanation for the increased risk could be that adverse lifestyle or risk factor changes are more common among those who work excessive hours compared with those working normal hours," said Virtanen. It's also possible that the chronic stress associated with working long hours adversely affects metabolic processes, she said.

Roughly half of the study subjects didn't work overtime. But 21 percent worked one extra hour, 15 percent worked two extra hours, and 10 percent worked three hours or more extra per day.

"At the moment there is no research on whether reduction in overtime work reduces CHD risk. Further research on this topic is therefore needed," said senior author Mika Kivimäki, from University College London, in a prepared statement. Kivimäki plans to investigate whether working long hours predicts changes in lifestyle, mental health and traditional risk factors, such as blood pressure, blood glucose and cholesterol.

It's unclear whether the findings generalize to blue-collar workers and employees in the private sector, the authors report.

In the journal, the study was accompanied by an editorial written by Gordon McInnes from University of Glasgow Western Infirmary. "If the effect is truly causal, the importance is much greater than commonly recognized," McInnes wrote. "Physicians should be aware of the risks of overtime and take seriously symptoms such as chest pain, monitor and treat recognized cardiovascular risk factors, particularly blood pressure, and advise an appropriate lifestyle modification."

McInnes concluded by quoting the English philosopher Bertrand Russell: "If I were a medical man, I should prescribe a holiday to any patient who considers work important."

Image: iStockphoto/nyul

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe