Photographing a Lunar Eclipse in 1960 Took More Than a Snap

Diagrams from the Scientific American archive document a feat of citizen science

J. F. Ossanna, Jr. and L. C. Thomas

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This Wednesday in the early morning hours skywatchers in select regions of the world will tune in for a spectacle known as the “super blue blood moon” eclipse. This rare event is called “super” because the full moon will be in perigee (at the point in its orbit when it is closest to Earth); “blue” as it happens to be the second full moon this month; and “blood” for the reddish tint it will take on as it passes through Earth’s shadow.

On March 13, 1960, another lunar eclipse was to take place, and two scientists were meticulously preparing to do what many of us will do with minimal effort on Wednesday: capture the event in a series of photographs. Given the current ubiquity of high-quality, easy-to-use smartphone cameras, we may forget how fraught such a task once was. For J. F. Ossanna, Jr., and L. C. Thomas, both engineers at Bell Telephone Laboratories and amateur photographers, figuring out the proper exposure needed to capture the eclipse involved a complex foray into astronomy, math and optics.

The December 1960 issue of Scientific American told their story in The Amateur Scientist, a sort of how-to column meant to facilitate adventures in citizen science. The diagrams below helped to explain their calculations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: J. F. Ossanna, Jr. and L. C. Thomas

Credit: J. F. Ossanna, Jr. and L. C. Thomas

Credit: J. F. Ossanna, Jr. and L. C. Thomas

Credit: J. F. Ossanna, Jr. and L. C. Thomas

Inscrutable as they may be to the average modern reader, perhaps some astronomy enthusiasts of the day were able to grasp these diagrams and reproduce the process for subsequent eclipses. Ossanna’s and Thomas’s efforts certainly paid off, yielding images like these. 

Credit: J. F. Ossanna, Jr. and L. C. Thomas

Lucky for us nowadays, technology has advanced significantly, and photography guides like this one are much easier to follow. Happy eclipse viewing!

Amanda Montañez is senior graphics editor and been at Scientific American since 2015. She produces and art directs information graphics for the Scientific American website and print magazine. Montañez has a bachelor's degree in studio art from Smith College and a master's in biomedical communications from the University of Toronto. Before starting in journalism, she worked as a freelance medical illustrator. Follow her on Bluesky @unamandita.bsky.social

More by Amanda Montañez

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe