October 14, 2014

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Stunning Infographics Net SciAm Two Awards

I’m thrilled to report that two Scientific American graphics (on bees and caffeine) are featured in The Best American Infographics 2014.

By Jen Christiansen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I’m thrilled to report that two Scientific American graphics (on bees and caffeine) are featured in The Best American Infographics 2014.

The book, which is edited by Gareth Cook, includes an impressive range of graphic styles and subject matter–from a fresh look at T. Rex (Nature) to an illustrated and playful look at the evolution of Justin Bieber (National Post) to a clean data-driven display of gun laws since Newtown (New York Times).

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The common thread? As statistician Nate Silver writes in the introduction, “…modern information design is equal parts art and science, form and function, architecture and engineering. It combines the best of at least three fields of achievement: aesthetics, technology, and journalism.” The best infographics combine those fields into a product that “tells a story that couldn’t be told in any other way.”

Thanks to collaborators Moritz Stefaner, Jillian Walters, and Golden Section Graphics (represented by Dirk Aschoff and Klaas Neumann) for lending their talents to the pages of Scientific American, and for creating visual explanations for the magazine that transcend their original context.

Here are the featured print graphics (below). For web-formatted versions of the graphics and text, see Where the Wild Bees Are and Caffeine High. For more on the bee graphic and a detailed look at how Stefaner developed the data visualization, see the process explanation on his blog.

"Why So Jittery?" from the November 2013 print issue of Scientific American. Graphic by Golden Section Graphics; Sources: Nutritionaction.com; Center for Science in the Public Interest

The Best American Infographics series editor, Gareth Cook, is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, a regular contributor to NewYorker.com, and editor of “Mind Matters,” Scientific American’s neuroscience blog.

Rights & Permissions

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe