The Science of Success in Science

Interactive data visualization traces the career paths of over 10,000 scientists in search of predictable patterns of impact

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


At what point in her career can a young or aspiring scientist expect to achieve success in her field? This week, the journal Science released a paper that attempts to answer this question. Using data from Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Physical Review journals, researchers compiled profiles of thousands of scientists across seven disciplines, tracing their careers over time and measuring the impact of each paper they published.

Interestingly, what they found is that there is no predictable pattern of success over one’s career. In fact, it seems completely random—a scientist’s most impactful publication might just as likely come at the beginning of his career, as toward the end or somewhere in the middle. And this rule holds true for all seven fields included in the study: biology, chemistry, cognitive science, ecology, economics, neuroscience, and physics.

Perhaps this seems like an underwhelming result. However, when presented visually, it actually becomes rather intriguing. Kim Albrecht, a data researcher and designer at the Center for Complex Network Research, has assembled the enormous quantity data from the study into a beautiful and information-rich work of interactive data visualization.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The series of GIFs below demonstrate how the visualization works, but you can also explore the tool on your own here. And in case you missed it, check out Albrecht’s Cosmic Web visualization, which I wrote about earlier this year.

Credit: Kim Albrecht

Credit: Kim Albrecht

Credit: Kim Albrecht

Credit: Kim Albrecht

Credit: Kim Albrecht

 

Amanda Montañez is senior graphics editor and been at Scientific American since 2015. She produces and art directs information graphics for the Scientific American website and print magazine. Montañez has a bachelor's degree in studio art from Smith College and a master's in biomedical communications from the University of Toronto. Before starting in journalism, she worked as a freelance medical illustrator. Follow her on Bluesky @unamandita.bsky.social

More by Amanda Montañez

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe