Active Sun at Birth Cut Historical Life Spans

High UV radiation during solar maxima may have degraded expectant mothers' stores of folate, a vitamin essential to development. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astrologists have long contended that the stars profoundly influence people here on Earth. And it looks like they may have stumbled onto the truth—at least when it comes to one star: the sun. Because a new analysis of Norwegian birth records suggests that children born during periods of high solar activity lived five years less, on average, than did their counterparts born during periods of low solar activity. And women born during solar maxima appear to have been less fertile. Those findings appear in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [Gine Roll Skjærvø et al, Solar activity at birth predicted infant survival and women’s fertility in historical Norway]

Researchers analyzed more than 8,600 births from 1676 to 1878, while controlling for other factors like socioeconomic class. And indeed, higher solar activity at birth appeared to cut life span. The reason, the researchers say, could be exposure to increased ultraviolet radiation during periods of high solar activity. Because that UV light can degrade an expectant mothers' stores of folate, a B vitamin essential to a baby's healthy development. It's unclear whether the effect would still hold today, as many pregnant women take supplements of the vitamin.

And despite the sun's potentially harmful effects, we still need it—to synthesize ample vitamin D. "A lot of the media now has been that if you're pregnant or planning to become pregnant, then you should avoid sun or not go south for the winter to get a lot of sun, especially if you're very pale." Study author Frode Fossøy, an evolutionary biologist at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.  "We also need sun, to get vitamin D—so it's a delicate balance."

There's an expression in Norwegian for that, he says. "Den gylne middelvei." The golden middle way, the middle road. "Moderation, yep. That's sensible."

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe