New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Ancient Marine Reptiles Had Familiar Gear

Ichthyosaurs had traits in common with turtles and modern marine mammals, like blubber and countershading camouflage. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Ichthyosaurs share traits with living dolphins, such as blubber and coloration.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Long before dolphins swam the seas, their near look-alike ichthyosaurs inhabited the earth's oceans. Now scientists say these ancient seafaring reptiles may have had more in common with modern-day sea turtles and marine mammals than we knew. 

Over time, a dead animal’s bones can be slowly replaced by minerals, leaving behind a rocky fossil. The researchers demineralized the 180-million-year-old fossil of an ichthyosaur…leaving them with soft, flexible tissues. 

"Which is kind of amazing."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Johan Lindgren, a paleontologist at Lund University in Sweden. "It turns out that organic remains, the skin, is still there, with cells and cellular organelles. And even traces of the original biomolecular makeup." 

Those remains revealed that the ichthyosaur sported camouflage appropriate for its underwater environment—light on the bottom, darker on top—like many marine animals have today.

The researchers also found a black, glossy substance that was harder to identify. So they collected dead sea turtles and porpoises and mimicked fossilization by heating and squashing the creatures’ skin. Which led them to realize that that the darker substance in the ichthyosaur fossil must be blubber. 

"So from having blubber we can say that, to some extent the ichthyosaurs must have been warm blooded, so to say. At least to the same degree as the leatherback turtle." 

The write-up and photos of the fossil are in the journal Nature. [Johan Lindgren et al, Soft-tissue evidence for homeothermy and crypsis in a Jurassic ichthyosaur]

There's one more intriguing secret contained in the remains: proteinaceous material. If you sequenced it, could you go backwards, and reconstruct the DNA that coded for the proteins? 

In other words:

Of course, ichthyosaurs were not dinosaurs, but the Jurassic Park methodology is what’s important. So, could we resurrect one starting from their protein sequences?

"Yeah well, perhaps. You should never say never!"

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe