New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Andromeda Snickers at Milky Way Mass

A new estimate finds that the Milky Way, once thought to be twice as massive as Andromeda, may actually only have half our neighbor galaxy's mass. Christopher Intagliata reports 

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How heavy is the Milky Way in comparison to its neighbor galaxy, Andromeda? Well, depends how you calculate it. In 2006 one group of astronomers figured the Milky Way was twice as massive as Andromeda. A 2009 estimate evened the score, calculating that the two galaxies are equal in mass.
 
Now a new formula suggests we're only half the mass of Andromeda. To come up with that number, astronomers first measured the speed and distance of galaxies between three and 10 million light-years away. That allowed them to calculate the deformation of spacetime, and thus the mass, of our stellar neighborhood, aka the Local Group—a group of more than 50 galaxies, in which the Milky Way and Andromeda dominate.
 
They deduced the center of mass between the two heavyweights and found that Andromeda may indeed be twice as massive as the Milky Way. The results are in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Jorge Peñarrubia et al, A dynamical model of the local cosmic expansion]
 
The researchers say this new model might be more accurate than past ones, because it accounts for dark matter far from each galaxy's center—assuming the data's right, that is.
 
"Well, I never bet money on anything. Because I'm aware of all the uncertainties and approximations." Lead author Jorge Peñarrubia of the University of Edinburgh. "One year from now, two years from now, some clever guy will come and say, ‘Hey, you forgot to include this, actually when you do everything changes,’ and then you will have to accept that."
 
For now, we'll just have to accept that we live in the wimpier of the two galaxies. At least until the next weigh-in.
 
—Christopher Intagliata
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe