New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Barred Owls Invade the Sierra Nevada

By listening to the sounds of the forest, biologists were able to identify an invasion of barred owls in spotted owl habitat. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The barred owl has a very distinctive call.

“It's the one that goes, ‘Who cooks for you?’”

[CLIP: Barred owl call sample]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Connor Wood is a conservation biologist and applied ecologist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison—who does a pretty great barred owl impression himself.

[CLIP: Impression of barred owl]

Barred owls are native to the eastern U.S. But in the last century, they’ve crossed the Great Plains, flooded into Canada and taken up roost in the Pacific Northwest, where they’re a major threat to northern spotted owls.

“Barred owls are bigger and more aggressive. And so barred owls have been able to basically drive spotted owls out of their preferred nesting areas. And also, because they’re more flexible with what they eat, there can be more barred owls on the landscape.”

And now they’re invading the Sierra Nevada mountains, further south—the native range of the California spotted owl.

“And the big question was: What is the size of the barred owl population there, and how fast is it growing?”

To answer that, Wood and his team deployed audio recorders in roughly 1,000 locations throughout 2,300 square miles of the northern Sierra Nevada. And then they listened—for two years—collecting the faint calls of spotted owls ...

[CLIP: Spotted owl]

... and barred owls, too.

[CLIP: Barred owl]

In total, they gathered 200,000 hours worth of audio.

“It was pretty daunting, seeing it all accumulate and knowing we had to make something intelligible out of it.”

Algorithms that combed the audio for owl calls helped make sense of it all, and through models, the researchers were able to estimate who was living in those forests—barred owls or spotted owls—and approximately how many of them there were.

“The key finding is that barred owls occupied about 8 percent of the northern Sierra Nevada landscape in 2017. But that jumps to 21 percent in 2018. So that’s a 2.6-fold increase in just one year. On one hand, that’s really worrying, because it suggests that barred owl population has begun to grow really rapidly and thus poses an immediate threat to California spotted owls. But on the other hand, it’s also really exciting. We’ve caught the problem early and have a chance to do something about it. Most biological invasions aren’t identified until it’s too late.”

The results are in the journal The Condor: Ornithological Applications. [Connor M. Wood et al,. Early detection of rapid Barred Owl population growth within the range of the California Spotted Owl advises the Precautionary Principle]

Wood and his team advise that it might be necessary to take lethal action: remove the barred owls before they wipe out California spotted owls. Assuming we give a hoot about the spotted owls’ survival. 

—Christopher Intagliata 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe