New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Beetle Liberation Due to Regurgitation

The bombardier beetle can spray its hot brew of toxic chemicals even after bring swallowed, to force a predator into vomiting it back out.

Shinji Sugiura Takuya Sato

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you’re a fan of nature shows, you’ve probably heard of the bombardier beetle. When disturbed, this weaponized insect can spray a boiling hot jet of noxious chemicals from its hind end—a response that even the hungriest predators find highly off-putting.

But what if that predator is so stealthy and quick that the beetle doesn’t have time to deploy its signature defense before it gets ‘et? Turns out, the explosion is also effective when detonated from the inside. We know this because a new study shows that the bombardier beetles can use their chemical weapons to escape from the belly of the toad that ate them. They accomplish this Jonah-like feat by using their chemical cocktail to encourage the amphibian to barf them back up. The finding is served up in the journal Biology Letters. [Shinji Sugiura and Takuya Sato, Successful escape of bombardier beetles from predator digestive systems]

Researchers collected 37 beetles and 37 toads from a forest in Central Japan. Some of the toads, those of the species Bufo japonicas, share their territory with the bombardier beetles. Others, the Bufo torrenticola, inhabit the nearby streams and don’t normally encounter these feisty bugs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Back in the lab, the researchers paired off their collected specimens and each toad was allowed to capture and swallow a single beetle. And then came the fireworks. As the authors note in their paper: “an explosion was audible inside each toad.” Which means that somewhere along the alimentary canal, the beetles dropped their bombs.

What happened next depended on the participants. About 35 percent of the japonicas toads, who presumably were familiar with the beetles, spit the critters back up. While 58 percent of the stream toads gave the researchers valuable feedback, literally—they upchucked, too.

As for the bugs, the larger ones were more likely to make it back out. The lucky ones escaped in under 15 minutes. And those less fortunate were in there up to an hour and a half. And though they emerged covered in mucus, all 16 vomited beetles returned alive and were able to walk away. Fifteen of them were still kicking two weeks later. And one survived to tell his tale for another a year and a half.

And it was largely their emetic emissions that saved them. Bugs who were prodded into depleting their chemical arsenals before they got eaten were never seen—or heard from—again. The authors note that “no toads died as a result of swallowing beetles.” But after their contribution to science, they probably avoided hot sauce.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe