New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Comet Dust Kicks Up Clouds over the Moon

The same particles that streak through Earth's atmosphere as "shooting stars" kick up lunar dust when they strike the surface of the atmosphere-less moon. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Every day, 100 tons of space dust rain down on the Earth's atmosphere. By night, we know this material as shooting stars. And our neighbor the moon is likewise exposed to that debris—but without an atmosphere to stop it. So all those particles strike the moon's surface, at 12 miles per second, like tiny bullets. And each impact kicks up a thousand times its weight, in moondust.

Mihály Horányi, a physicist at the University of Colorado, makes this analogy: "Imagine you are making pasta and there's flour on the table, and you get impatient and upset and you smack the table. There's going to be a whole cloud of tiny particles, you know, flying off the table." 

Horányi and his colleagues sampled that cloud of particles with NASA's Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer, or LADEE, as it orbited the moon, slurping up dust. Judging by the shape and density of the dust cloud, the scientists say the particles striking the moon and kicking up the cloud must be mostly high-speed comet grains, rather than slower bits of asteroid. And, as you might expect, the moon's halo of dust increases during heavy bombardment—the same time that we have meteor showers here on Earth. The findings are in the journal Nature. [Mihály Horányi et al, A permanent, asymmetric dust cloud around the Moon]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There is one mystery these measurements do not solve: the source of the strange "horizon glow" the Apollo astronauts observed on the moon. Because Horányi says that, based on these samples, there just isn't enough dust to create the visual effect the astronauts saw. Not that this is 'case closed.' "There is not a single paper or a single measurement that I can claim to be the last word on anything, so, no, as always, there are more questions and open issues. But one way to figure out is to try it again. Send people. Orbit the moon again and see if we have better instruments and take better images, see if we could resolve this." But if NASA's current plans are any indication, it might be a while before any American astronauts see that glow firsthand.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe