Commuting Patterns Help Forecast Flu Outbreaks

Flu forecasts within large metro areas like New York City might be improved by adding in data about the flow of commuters. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Getty Images/Wavebreak Media Thinkstock Images \ Wavebreakmedia Ltd (MARS) 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Every flu season—that’s now through the spring—epidemiologists track flu infections as they break out across the country. And they forecast how bad it's going to get: at the national level, regionally, state by state. They even forecast for metro areas, like New York City, and L.A. Which sounds pretty fine-grained, until you consider that New York City is made up of five boroughs. And that there are actually more than 80 cities… in L.A. County. 

So there might be an advantage to forecasting at even smaller scales. "Public health decision-making and interventions are done at small scales, they're done at the municipal and county scale." Jeffrey Shaman, an infectious disease modeler at Columbia University. 

He and his team built a model to forecast flu within New York City neighborhoods and boroughs, using data on flu cases from 2008 through 2013. They added in something they called "network connectivity"—commuter data, basically. The commuter data didn't improve the accuracy of hyper-local, neighborhood-level forecasts. But it did improve predictions at the borough level, compared to models without that sort of commuter flow built in. The results are in the journal PLoS Computational Biology. [Wan Yang, Donald R. Olson, Jeffrey Shaman: Forecasting Influenza Outbreaks in Boroughs and Neighborhoods of New York City]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Shaman says fine-tuned forecasts could warn local hospitals before a big outbreak. "Knowing when that's going to be will allow them to plan the resources out. Have the staff available. They need gloves, beds, they need ventilators, they need to have those appropriately available in time so they can meet that patient surge." And—so they can stop the virus' spread in that most local of networks: within the hospital itself.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe