Drones Spy On Birds in Flight

Quadcopters appear to be a relatively benign tool to study the behavior and numbers of wetland birds. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Studying birds for a living might sound like a cool job. But it's not without its logistical challenges, for us landbound animals. "I can remember precisely a location where I had a northern gannet, so a really large bird, breeding on the top of the cliff." 

David Grémillet, a seabird ecologist at the French National Center for Scientific Research. 

"And from the bottom of the cliff I couldn't see what was happening in that nest. I couldn't even see whether the bird was home or not." 

Grémillet says technology offers a simple solution: "A drone carefully flown at high altitude over the colony would have been really helpful." That's right—a drone. Grémillet says scientists and citizens alike are increasingly using drones to approach birds—either for fun or legitimate research. But they’re taking flight without knowing how the aerial robots might affect their avian study subjects. 

So Grémillet and his colleagues hit the zoo, employing a professional drone pilot to fly test runs near mallard ducks [clip: drone study sound] with a 14-inch-diameter quadcopter. They then got permission to repeat the experiment on wild flamingos and greenshanks in the Camargue, a huge wetland in southern France. 

After several hundred flights, the researchers found that the birds didn't seem to care about the drones' color, or approach speed. And the equipment could get as close as 13 feet to the birds without disturbing them—as long as they didn't approach from overhead—an angle associated with predators. The study is in the journal Biology Letters. [Elisabeth Vas et al, Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines]

All these hi-tech tools could be a boon to wildlife ecologists. "But at the same time you always have to assess the impact of the technology you're using on animal welfare." And maybe drone welfare too. Search YouTube and you'll find that birds of prey, like some privacy advocates, perceive drones as a threat—and make the technology crash, literally. [clip: bird attacking drone, motor stopping, and crashing.]

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe