E.T. May Reveal Itself with Vibration

Looking for movement could complement chemical searches for extraterrestrial life. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When we look for life beyond Earth, we usually search for its chemical signatures. The recent discovery of methane emissions on Mars, for example, is a possible sign of bacterial life. But there IS another way to detect life. See if it moves. 

"Everything moves. [laughter] I'm looking for something that I know that should be alive and does not move, but up to now I have not seen anything like this." Giovanni Longo, a physicist at the École Polytechnique Fédérale in Lausanne, Switzerland. “It’s extremely interesting, because it gives us a possible new definition of life if you want. If it moves, then it's alive."

Longo and his colleagues studied the movements of bacteria, yeast, mouse, human and plant cells, using the nanosensor in an atomic force microscope. And they found that every living cell they studied vibrated in tune with the metabolic processes going on inside. When they altered bits of the cells' metabolism, the vibrations changed; when they killed the cells in the sample chamber--the vibrations stopped. The findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Sandor Kasas et al, Detecting nanoscale vibrations as signature of life

Using their nanosensor search technique, the researchers were able to detect the vibrations of life in soil and water samples, too. So why not do the same thing on Mars? An atomic force microscope has in fact already been sent there, on the Phoenix Lander, though it wasn't set up to do these types of analyses. "But it can be done, so next time they can just modify it a little bit." And in doing so - expand our suite of life-detecting tools.

—Christopher Intagliata


[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe