New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Flaky Scalps Have a Unique Fungal Microbiome

Certain species of bacteria and fungi seem to proliferate on dandruff-ridden scalps. The reason is a little more mysterious. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

There’s a lot of advertising mythology about what causes dandruff. Like this:

[CLIP: “Here's why clean scalp is important. Your hair roots must breathe—]or there’s trouble; deep trouble; dandruff.”]

“Dandruff itself is actually a very, very complicated condition.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Barry Murphy, a microbiologist and molecular biologist at Unilever in the U.K., says dandruff is a perfect storm of flakiness—involving your fungal microbiome, the health and oiliness of the skin on your scalp, even weather! 

His team set out to investigate the microbial component. They sequenced DNA from the heads of people with healthy hair and others with dry, dandruffy scalps—none of whom had used antidandruff shampoo within the last six months. 

As previous studies have found, they spotted 10 times as much of a type of fungus called Malassezia on dandruff scalps versus the healthy cohort. But they also found that populations of a bacterium called Staphylococcus capitis spiked on flaky scalps. 

“Really, really interestingly, we found there was approximately 100 times more of this bacteria on a dry or a dandruff scalp than there was on a healthy scalp.” 

But it’s still a mystery why it’s there—or what it’s doing. The results are in the journal PLOS ONE. [Sally G. Grimshaw et al., The diversity and abundance of fungi and bacteria on the healthy and dandruff affected human scalp]

Murphy’s employer Unilever makes its own antidandruff products. So this could be useful information someday. But rather than just zapping scalp fungi with antifungal compounds like most of today’s antidandruff shampoos do, Murphy says the goal might be to make a more gentle product. 

“It should be about trying to restore an equilibrium. It should be about microbiome balance. It should be about the very fact that we’ve lived in harmony with these microbes for millions and millions of years.”

Either way, it seems the old lore that a dandruffy scalp just needs a thorough “cleaning” might be a little flaky.  

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe