Gut Bacteria Signal Your Brain When They're Full

Twenty minutes into a meal, E. coli pump out appetite-suppressing proteins, which could influence our feeling of hunger. Christopher Intagliata reports

GETTY (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This Thanksgiving, as you savor your turkey and stuffing, here's something else to give thanks for: the army of microbes that help you digest the feast. Because when you eat, you're feeding them too—and triggering an enormous bloom of gut bacteria. In fact, as many as a billion new E. coli bacteria may come into being during one of those feeding frenzies. But twenty minutes after that population explosion begins, the bacteria reach critical mass, and put on the brakes. And when they enter that 'resting state,' they start pumping out a particular suite of proteins.

Researchers harvested those postprandial proteins from E. coli and added them to the colons of rats. And the proteins appeared to interact with endocrine cells in the gut, flipping on the production of hormones that tell the brain "Hey, stop eating. We're full." Meanwhile, mice injected with the E. coli proteins over the course of a week ate less at each meal (though they compensated by eating more often.) All of which suggests that the proteins put out by bacteria can influence—and even interfere with—our sense of feeling stuffed. The study is in the journal Cell Metabolism. [Jonathan Breton et al, Gut Commensal E. coli Proteins Activate Host Satiety Pathways following Nutrient-Induced Bacterial Growth]

As far as overeating goes—the researchers say we probably won't inject people with bacterial appetite suppressants anytime soon. But it might be worth paying closer attention to the health and composition of our gut bacteria, since they do appear to play a role in regulating our urge to eat. So as you’re stuffing yourself with stuffing on Thursday, you might ask yourself: what would my gut bacteria want?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe