Hawking, a Paradox and a Black Hole Mystery, Solved?

We do not have a theory to tell us everything about how a black hole works, but new research is shedding a least some light on one of their many mysteries.

A conceptual illustration showing a wormhole tunnel through space time

Jason Drakeford

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Tulika Bose: This is 60-Second Science. I'm Tulika Bose.

You probably already know what a black hole is, but have you ever heard of the black hole information paradox? I'm here with Clara Moskowitz, our space and physics editor who just edited a big, special issue for Scientific American on black holes. Hey, Clara.

Clara Moskowitz: Hi, thanks for having me.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tulika Bose: So, Clara, what are we here to talk about today?

Clara Moskowitz: We're here to talk about the black hole information paradox, which has been a problem in physics for a long time. Basically black holes seem to break the rules of physics. And part of the reason why is because we have to use two different theories to describe them. And the two theories do not get along.

On the one hand, we have quantum mechanics, which describes the world of the very small atoms and particles. On the other hand, we have general relativity, which describes things that are very big, very massive, very large, and most things in the world don't require both theories. They're either big or they're small black holes are both black holes are the densest things in the entire universe.

And they take up very little space, but they have so much mass. You really need both theories. And yet when you try to combine quantum mechanics and general relativity, everything goes crazy.

Tulika Bose: How can two rules of physics not apply?

Clara Moskowitz: Each one works perfectly in its own realm. So quantum mechanics does very well describing everything that's, that's subatomic, everything that we can't see, that's very small, and general relativity works perfectly to describe very big things like the motions of planets, but we almost never have to combine them in one example, except for black holes. Black holes take up very little space, but they have so much mass that general relativity and quantum mechanics equally apply. And yet when you try to combine the two theories, they don't work together.

Tulika Bose: How exactly do they not work together?

Clara Moskowitz: Basically, when you try to combine them the equations break, they give infinities, they just don't produce answers or calculations that you can use that you can work with.

And it's a sign that something is missing. We don't fully understand something. And the thing that we don't fully understand is gravity. So quantum mechanics has been made to work very well with every other theory, and every other force of nature. Quantum mechanics can describe electromagnetism and the strong and the weak force that works inside atoms, but it can't describe gravity.

And yet with black holes, you have something that's teeny tiny, and yet the gravity is super strong. And when we try to describe what's going on in them, We can't, we don't have a theory to tell us everything about how a black hole works, and we really don't understand what's going on inside them.

Tulika Bose: How long have we known about this paradox?

Clara Moskowitz: So this paradox dates back 50 years, and the story basically starts with Steven Hawking in 1974. He discovered that black holes leak. They let out radiation over time, particle by particle. They get smaller and smaller and smaller, and eventually they completely disappear. Sounds weird, but, okay. The problem is that if black holes can disappear, so can all the information about what fell into.

And that is a huge problem because that breaks the laws of physics. According to quantum mechanics, information can never be destroyed. You might think information is destroyed all the time, when you shred an invoice or burn a book, for instance. But according to physics, if you had complete knowledge of the book ahead of time of every atom and every molecule within the book, then you could follow each atom and molecule through the burning process to see where they all ended up and everything would be fine.

But black holes aren't like this. If a black hole is destroyed, it's completely destroyed and there's no way to access the information that it once held. And that can't be, that's a paradox.

Tulika Bose: Wow. But obviously there's new information and new research. Can you tell me about it?

Clara Moskowitz: Right. So for 50 years, scientists have been puzzling over this issue and trying to figure out what's going on and whether there's a way to save the information that's inside black holes.

And finally, in the last few years, they've had a major breakthrough. The breakthrough involves several, very mind bending concepts. One of them is wormhole, which is bridges in space time. These, these are shortcuts in space time that connect two very distant points. And the other has to do with the weird rules of quantum mechanics.

According to quantum mechanics, everything that can happen. Does happen. So a particle, for instance, doesn't just travel along a straight line from point a to point B. Instead it takes all of the possible paths that could connect point a and point B. It circles up, it loops down, it twists around before arriving at point B and all of those things happen S.

Well, when you apply this concept to black holes, it means that you have to consider all of the possible arrangements of space, time within black holes. All of them are simultaneously real. And one of the possible arrangements of space time is a wormhole. So these are these weird theoretical bridges shortcuts in space and time.

And there's a chance that the inside of a black hole is connected to the inside of another black hole through a wormhole. Well, you have to take this possibility. This chance into account physicists recently figured out. And when they did everything changed the equations that they used to describe the entropy in black holes, basically a description of the amount of disorder gave a totally different answer and they pointed to a solution for a way that information could escape black holes.

And this way is called an island. Now of all the weird things we've talked about already, this is the weirdest. This is the idea that deep within black holes, there's a special region called an island. And this region is both inside the black hole and also outside the black hole at the same time. And that the information that's within the island, since it's inside and outside, can escape the black hole's destruction and is never truly destroyed, even if the black hole evaporates away completely and disappears. And this seemed to resolve the paradox.

So there are a lot of questions still to be answered. Everything's not totally settled and not all physicists agree that this is the solution.

But it definitely does seem to point way forward toward resolving the paradox, showing how information can escape from black holes and pointing us toward a future where we can describe black holes finally, with a consistent physical theory.

Just in case you wanna know more about some of these really mind bending concepts that we've been talking about check out the September issue of Scientific American, where we have a bunch of articles describing in detail, all of these new ideas, along with a really cool video that draws it out for you, if you're a visual person and want to see what these things might look like.

Tulika Bose: Thanks for listening for 60-Second Science. I'm Tulika Bose.

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

Jeffery DelViscio is currently chief multimedia editor/executive producer at Scientific American. He is former director of multimedia at STAT, where he oversaw all visual, audio and interactive journalism. Before that he spent more than eight years at the New York Times, where he worked on five different desks across the paper. He holds dual master's degrees in journalism and in Earth and environmental sciences from Columbia University. He has worked onboard oceanographic research vessels and tracked money and politics in science from Washington, D.C. He was a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018. His work has won numerous awards, including two News and Documentary Emmy Awards.

More by Jeffery DelViscio

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe