Help ID Moon Craters from Your Couch

Citizen scientists have helped professional astronomers locate more than 500 million lunar craters by using an app called MoonMappers. Karen Hopkin reports 

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tired of playing Angry Birds while you wait for the bus? Why not explore the surface of the moon? Seriously. During the past two years, citizen scientists have helped locate more than 500 million lunar craters by using an app called MoonMappers. Even more impressive: the public’s picks matched those submitted by professional astronomers, findings that appear in the journal Icarus. [Stuart J. Robbins et al, The variability of crater identification among expert and community crater analysts]
 
Laypersons lend a hand in everything from cataloging bird migration to predicting how proteins fold. But does this amateur assistance actually help? To find out, researchers asked eight experts to identify craters in data collected by a NASA orbiter. And they compared the experts’ selections with those generated by folks using the MoonMappers app.
 
The results: ordinary people can spot craters like the pros. That’s good news for astronomers, who are counting on volunteers to help classify the condition of those craters, from “it’s perfect” for those pockmarks with pristine edges to “that’s a crater?” for the ones that look like rounded dents.
 
Examining these visual markers of past collisions will teach us more about the history of our solar system. And could help you kick that Candy Crush habit.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe