New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

House Dust Organisms Reveal Location and Residents

The particular fungi found in house dust can tell investigators where you live, and the bacteria in the dust can give away who and what you live with

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The dust that accumulates in the corners of your house does more than just cause allergies and aggravation—it’s also teeming with clues about where you live and who you live with. That’s the finding of a study in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [Albert Barberán et al, The ecology of microscopic life in household dust]

Researchers had volunteers at nearly 1,200 homes across the U.S. collect indoor and outdoor dust samples. The average home’s dust contains about 5,000 types of bacteria and 2,000 types of fungi.

The fungi gave away a lot about a home’s location. Different regions have different fungal populations, and thus so do houses within those regions. For example, dwellings around the Great Lakes had very different fungi than did homes in Arizona—because most household fungi originate outside and come in either on people’s clothes or through windows and doors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As for the bacteria, those were strong indicators of the identity of the home’s residents. Much of the bacteria was shed by the human body and was a pretty good indicator of a home’s gender ratio. The single-celled organisms also showed whether a pet shared the home—cats and dogs make their own contributions to the indoor bacterial menagerie.

The research could inform forensic investigations and allergy studies.

In the meantime, what can we take from these findings? Well, you can clean up dust but you can’t change its composition. That is, unless you move. Or make some changes in the pets and people you live with.

—Erika Beras

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe