"Imperfect" Vaccines May Aid Survival of Ultrahot Viruses

Certain vaccines prevent sickness and death, but don't block transmission—meaning they may actually give some viral strains an extra shot at survival. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the 1960s a cancer-causing herpes virus was ravaging the poultry industry. The virus caused what's called Marek's disease—and killed 1 to 2 percent of the birds. "Given that there are billions of birds in the industry, that's a lot of birds." Andrew Read, an evolutionary biologist at Penn State University. He says the virus was easy to catch. "The dander of chickens if full of the virus. If you shake a chicken, the virus drops out."

Then, in 1970 a new vaccine put an end to most of the deaths. But the poultry vaccine, unlike most, was a so-called "leaky" or "imperfect" vaccine. "The vaccine is lifesaving, but it allows the infection to persist and transmit from the host." Meaning you could still shake a vaccinated chicken—and make it rain viruses.

Now, Read and his colleagues have shown that these leaky vaccines may actually give some viral strains an evolutionary leg up. Because the most virulent strains usually wipe out unvaccinated birds in just 10 days—not enough time for the birds to infect many others. These viruses are essentially so "hot" they burn themselves out. But vaccinated birds survive infection with the hot virus, and shed it for weeks—allowing strains that would otherwise die out to stick around, and kill any unprotected birds. The study appears in the journal PLoS Biology. [Andrew F. Read et al, Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of course, none of this is reason to doubt the efficacy of vaccines. "Vaccines have been one of the most important public health interventions. And the most cost effective we've ever had. And they're critically important in food chain security as well. So vaccines themselves are fantastic." But several imperfect vaccines for malaria are currently being tested. If they're approved, he says, we'll need to use other measures, like bed nets, to block transmission—remembering that not all vaccines are a one-shot deal.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe