Infants Already Glued to Multiple Screens

A new survey suggests that most kids by age two are using tablets and smartphones, sometimes while watching TV. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ever sit around watching TV, while scanning your smartphone or tablet? It's called 'second screening.' And apparently the instinct to multitask kicks in early—because even infants are doing it these days. So says a new survey presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies, in San Diego. [Hilda Kabali et al, First Exposure and Use of Mobile Media in Young Children]

Researchers surveyed 370 parents at a hospital in urban Philadelphia. Nearly every household had a TV; more than three quarters had smartphones and tablets. According to the parents, infants just six months old were already logging half an hour a day on mobile devices. And they were not just watching cartoons. A third were swiping and tapping the screens; and a quarter of the babies were actually making calls—although probably by accident. By age two, nearly all the kids were reported to be using tablets and smartphones—sometimes while glued to the TV.

Question is, is that a bad thing? The American Academy of Pediatrics says yes. Their take is, kids under two shouldn't be staring at screens at all—because they'll learn more slowly from screens than from interacting with people. 

But the researchers behind this new survey say the effect of smartphones and tablets on young brains isn't that clear—it is new technology, after all. And their agnosticism about mobile technology was perhaps best reflected on the last page of the survey, where they invited survey takers to enter a raffle—to win an iPad.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe