New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Infants Already Glued to Multiple Screens

A new survey suggests that most kids by age two are using tablets and smartphones, sometimes while watching TV. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ever sit around watching TV, while scanning your smartphone or tablet? It's called 'second screening.' And apparently the instinct to multitask kicks in early—because even infants are doing it these days. So says a new survey presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies, in San Diego. [Hilda Kabali et al, First Exposure and Use of Mobile Media in Young Children]

Researchers surveyed 370 parents at a hospital in urban Philadelphia. Nearly every household had a TV; more than three quarters had smartphones and tablets. According to the parents, infants just six months old were already logging half an hour a day on mobile devices. And they were not just watching cartoons. A third were swiping and tapping the screens; and a quarter of the babies were actually making calls—although probably by accident. By age two, nearly all the kids were reported to be using tablets and smartphones—sometimes while glued to the TV.

Question is, is that a bad thing? The American Academy of Pediatrics says yes. Their take is, kids under two shouldn't be staring at screens at all—because they'll learn more slowly from screens than from interacting with people. 

But the researchers behind this new survey say the effect of smartphones and tablets on young brains isn't that clear—it is new technology, after all. And their agnosticism about mobile technology was perhaps best reflected on the last page of the survey, where they invited survey takers to enter a raffle—to win an iPad.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe