Juno spacecraft data suggest lightning on Jupiter is much more common than we thought—but it congregates near the poles, not the equator as on Earth. Christopher Intagliata reports.
The whistlers, as they're known, were radio broadcasts from unusual, natural antennas: lightning bolts, which act like radio transmitters, with current moving through a channel.
Along with photos of the dark side of the planet, the whistlers confirmed the existence of lightning on Jupiter. But the limited observations made it hard to pin down where electrical storms gathered… and the bolts were thought to be rare, compared to Earth.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Now the Juno spacecraft has detected the first high-frequency radio signals, and 1,600 new whistlers ..., which together suggest lightning on Jupiter is much more common than scientists thought. And a lot more similar to Earth lightning, too. The discharges also appear to be between clouds containing liquid water and others containing water ice…, the same kind of conditions for cloud-to-cloud lightning here on Earth.
There is one twist to this Jovian weather story: Jupiter's lightning storms congregate near the planet's poles, not its equator—the opposite of Earth. A detail that makes this familiar phenomenon still seem a bit otherworldly.
—Christopher Intagliata
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
