New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Lab-Grown Human Mini Brains Show Brainy Activity

As the little structures grow, their constituents specialize into different types of brain cells, begin to form connections and emit brain waves. They could be useful models for development and neurological conditions.

Alysson Muotri holds a tray of Neandertal “mini brains” in his lab.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s not easy to study the early development of the human brain.

“The brain is very inaccessible, especially the early fetal stages. It’s just not ethical to study normal, healthy human brains.”

University of California, San Diego, biologist Alysson Muotri. He says researchers have instead relied on animal models.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“But the human brain is so much different from other species that we’re desperate to have, really, a human model so we can study the human brain.”

Now Muotri’s team may have that model, in the form of small globules of brain cells they’ve created in the lab. These pea-sized structures develop from stem cells that are bathed in a culture of nutrients, along with proteins that control gene activation. As the little structures grow, their constituents also specialize into different types of brain cells.

“And they willform connections, and these connections will form functional synapses that will, later on, turn into networks.”

After two months, the mini brains even begin to emit brain waves.

“And you can record every week to see how the activity has changed. And when they reach about six months of age, we see a growth exponentially in the number of connections and synapses that they can make.”

And at around 10 months, their brain activity compares to that of premature human infants.

“They’re pretty much followingthesame trajectory as the human brain does.”

That could make the mini brains very useful for understanding how our brains become wired early on. And they could also provide insights into the development of neurological conditions such as autism and epilepsy.

“These very early stages are exactly when some neurological conditions appear. And we have the possibility to help millions of people with neurological conditions.”

But Muotri also cautions that as the technology moves forward, ethical questions will start to emerge.

“Someone might ask, ‘Are they conscious or are they self-aware? Can they feel pain?’ I think we are in a gray zone, where this technology could evolve to something more complex. And then I think the ethical question would be, ‘What’s the moral status of these miniaturized brains?’”

Muotri says that same question has formed the basis for the rules and regulations governing the use of animals in the lab, which can serve as a model to guide the mini brain research. The findings are in the journal Cell Stem Cell. [Cleber A. Trujillo, et al., Complex oscillatory waves emerging from cortical organoids model early human brain network development]

In addition to shedding light on neurological development, mini brains could also help reveal how the human brain evolved and play a role in improving algorithms for artificial intelligence. These pea-sized brains may produce some big insights.

—Susanne Bard

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast]

Susanne Bard is a science writer and multimedia producer based on the West Coast. She has created content for Scientific American, Science magazine, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, as well as for museums and zoos.

More by Susanne Bard

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe