New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Latex Lining Could Quiet Plane Rides

Engineers devised a latex-laced honeycomb material that could make an airplane cabin sound more like a quiet living room. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Unless you have a pair of noise-canceling headphones, flying can be annoying to the ears. A lot of low-pitched rumbling makes it into the cabin. Problem is, the wings, floors, ceilings and bulkheads are lined with a lightweight material with a honeycomb structure—which adds structural integrity to the aircraft—but engine and airflow sound cuts right through. 

"The physical law says that the lighter the material is, the worse it can block sound." Yun Jing is an acoustician at North Carolina State University.

In a quest for quiet, he and his colleagues constructed a similar material—but with a quarter-millimeter thin layer of latex stretched across the cells of the honeycomb. In tests, the latex-laced structure cut the intensity of low-frequency rumbling to a thousandth of its previous level—enough, he says, to make an airplane cabin sound more like a peaceful living room. The study is in the journal Applied Physics Letters. [Ni Sui et al, A lightweight yet sound-proof honeycomb acoustic metamaterial]

Problem is, the material Jing developed is six percent heavier than the standard stuff. And more weight means more fuel means more expense. But if we settled for a slightly quieter flight, Jing says he could use less latex, making the noise-blocking honeycomb just a few percent heavier. Considering that the honeycomb is already one of the lightest parts of an airplane, you’re then looking at only a modest plane weight gain. 

Of course, that's assuming everyone wants a quieter plane. "Some people say they actually want to hear the sound of the engine. They don't want the cabin to be too quiet. They want to make sure the plane is still flying." Sounds like you’ll need those expensive headphones a little while longer.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe