New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Lyme Helps Spread Other Tick Infections

Mice infected with Lyme and the Babesia parasite are more likely to pass on babesiosis than mice infected with babesiosis alone. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lyme disease may be the most well known illness spread by ticks. But it's far from the only one. The most common vector for Lyme is the deer tick, and it spreads five other known pathogens. One of those pathogens is what’s called the Babesia parasite. It infects red blood cells, like malaria, causing the sometimes-fatal disease babesiosis.

Now we learn that these tick-borne diseases may have more in common than their host. Because Lyme disease may actually facilitate the spread of babesiosis. That's according to a study in the journal PLOS ONE. [Jessica M. Dunn et al, Borrelia burgdorferi Promotes the Establishment of Babesia microti in the Northeastern United States

Researchers allowed ticks to feed on mice infected with babesiosis, or with both babesiosis and Lyme. And ticks that fed on mice with just babesiosis were less likely to pick up the parasites than were ticks who munched on mice carrying both infections. Study author Maria Diuk-Wasser of Columbia University says the one-two punch of both diseases could be too much for the mice to handle. "The immune system may be, we could say, occupied with one pathogen, and decreases the response to the other one." Based on field studies, she and her co-authors believe the same phenomenon may be happening in nature, too.

For now, at least, babesiosis isn't as widespread as Lyme. And if these results are correct, cutting down on Lyme's prevalence might also slow the spread of babesiosis, "So we would get a synergistic effect of a control method that could attack both diseases at the same time." If, that is, we can find a truly effective way to limit Lyme.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe