Male Bats Up Mating Odds With Mouth Morsels

Males that allow females to take food right out of their mouths are more likely to sire offspring with their dining companions.

"Scrounging event," in which one bat takes food from another.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sharing a meal is a standard first step in the mating rituals of many mammals. But Egyptian fruit bats take “splitting an entrée” to a whole other level. Because males that allow females to take the food right out of their mouths are repaid with reproductive rights—and are more likely to sire offspring with their favorite female fruit finaglers. That’s according to a study in the journal Current Biology. [Lee Harten et al., Food for Sex in Bats Revealed as Producer Males Reproduce with Scrounging Females]

A couple years back, researchers noticed that in fruit bat colonies some bats forage for food while others simply snatch it from the foragers’ mouths.

“And there are different hypotheses for explaining this.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yossi Yovel of Tel-Aviv University has studied these bats for years. Maybe the scroungers were relatives, he says. Or maybe they were just socially dominant bullies.

“What we observed is that mostly scroungers are females.”

That got the researchers thinking about something of great importance to most animals: reproduction.

“And specifically we were wondering whether females might then mate with males that provide them with food. So this was the hypothesis, the sex-for-food hypothesis, that we tested.”

Yovel and his colleagues monitored the interactions among bats in their colony for more than a year, and they checked the paternity of the baby bats that were born. What they found is that females were more likely to make babies with those males that provided free meals.

But Yovel says that the process is not strictly transactional: “So sometimes they took a lot of food from a specific individual but did not mate with him. What’s important is, what we think, is the bond between the two. So if this individual is the main provider of the female then the probability that they will later mate increases.”

That means that offering free lunch is no guarantee for an amorous male, but it does up his odds. And unlike human males, batboys clearly learn that it’s in their romantic interest to chew with their mouths open.

—Karen Hopkin

(The above text is a transcript of this podcast)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe