New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mars Surface Glass Could Hold Ancient Fossils

Scientists have found ancient "impact glass" on the surface of Mars, which formed when asteroids struck, a billion or more years ago. If anything was alive at the time, biological materials could be trapped inside. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you're looking for signs of past life on Earth, some of the evidence is obvious. "Finding a trilobite fossil is a no-brainer, we all can understand that one, or a dinosaur bone." Jack Mustard, a Brown University geologist. 

He says less obvious signs of ancient life can be found in glass. Specifically, impact glass--which forms when asteroids slam into the planet, rapidly heating and melting the rocks around them. "Impact glass on the Earth can preserve biological material in a kind of capsule, a time capsule if you will." 

Here on Earth, for instance, scientists have found impact glass containing ancient plant matter, and other chemical signatures of life


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Jack and his colleague Kevin Cannon have now spotted the same sort of impact glass on Mars, using the spectrometer on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Which means Martian glass might also hold evidence of life. If the Red Planet ever harbored life, that is. 

The glass is more than just a potential time capsule. Its mineral structure also makes it an attractive snack for certain microbes. "Microbes eat geologic materials. But it can be a really slow process. Glass on the other hand is something that is kinda like having a Dorito for a microbe, because you can just start chewing away at it, and it's quite delicious, and you just munch right through it." Meaning it also might be worth inspecting glass for anything living on it—not just trapped inside. The findings are in the journal Geology. [Kevin M. Cannon and John F. Mustard, Preserved glass-rich impactites on Mars]

So does this study suggest we should abandon the old "follow the water" mantra when looking for life? "I certainly think it would not lend itself to, let's change the course of this ship and follow the glass. But I think where we're at is developing significantly interesting hypotheses to explore." And the Mars 2020 mission, which will collect samples for eventual return to Earth, might just be the perfect opportunity to start.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe