Martian Winds Could Spread Microbe Hitchhikers

Microbes fly tens of miles over Chile’s dry, UV-blasted Atacama Desert—and scientists say the same could happen on Mars. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Picture taken at one of the sites inspected in the Coastal Range of the Atacama Desert. Researchers Armando Azua-Bustos and Carlos González-Silva don sterile suites and use sterile collecting materials in order to avoid contaminating the studied sites.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Curiosity Rover was never fully sterilized before it touched down on Mars. And there’s been debate whether the rover drill might contaminate certain subsurface areas thought to potentially harbor life. But it turns out the rover may not need to physically drive somewhere to pollute that spot with Earth’s microbes. Because if there are any tiny earthlings on the rover, the strong winds on Mars might be able to spread them around the Red Planet instead. 

“Wind storms are very common on Mars on the planetary scale. So you have one point of contamination, and given the proper conditions, you could disperse whatever you were carrying there to distant places.” 

Armando Azua-Bustos, a research scientist at the Center for Astrobiology at the Superior Council of Scientific Research in Spain. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Azua-Bustos is now more certain that such spread might be possible because of an experiment his team carried out in Chile’s Atacama Desert—the conditions of which make it a popular Mars analogue. There, his team placed petri dishes along two paths cutting from the coast into the driest parts of the Atacama. One path was 30 miles long; the other 40 miles long. They waited for winds to deliver coastal dust to the plates. Then they grew whatever landed. 

On both paths, they found a multitude of viable bacterial and fungal species, which suggests that microbes are indeed able to fly over the driest and most UV-blasted desert on Earth in just a matter of hours—and arrive unharmed. The details are in the journal Scientific Reports. [Armando Azua-Bustos et al., Aeolian transport of viable microbial life across the Atacama Desert, Chile: Implications for Mars]

The researchers say wind could therefore be a way to easily contaminate another planet with Earth microbes if spacecraft aren’t sterilized—or a way for Martian life in once-fertile areas to hitchhike to others by flying on dust in the wind.

—Christopher Intagliata 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe