Miley Cyrus and Macaroni Combo Enables Brain-Based ID

An individual's unique brain response to images of a celebrity and a food could be used to create an ID procedure at high-security sites.  

 

Getty Images/iStockphoto/Thinkstock (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In what may be hailed as one of the most significant scientific advances of all time, researchers have discovered a use for Adam Sandler and Brussels sprouts. Because when you look at pictures of celebrities like Sandler along with dishes like sprouts, your brain responds differently than anyone else’s. That unique pattern of brain activity—the neural equivalent of a fingerprint—can be used to identify you with perfect accuracy. So say scientists in a study in the journal IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. [Maria V. Ruiz-Blondet, Zhanpeng Jin and Sarah Laszlo, CEREBRE: A Novel Method for Very High Accuracy Event-Related Potential Biometric Identification]

Last year this same team published work in which they recorded subjects’ responses to a series of words, like “podiatrist” or “sluice.” Because people’s brains respond differently to terms with which they are familiar—and no two people have the exact same vocabulary—showing someone enough words should produce a pattern of neural responses, in other words a brain print, unique to that individual. Indeed, the researchers found they could pinpoint one person out of a group of 32 with an accuracy of 97 percent.

But given the work’s potential security applications—think Pentagon entry or nuclear weapons command—the researchers wanted to push the technique further to achieve absolute certitude. So they decided to throw in pics of foods and famous folk about which people were likely to harbor strong personal preferences. Like liver and Angelina Jolie or halibut and Anne Hathaway.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fifty volunteers looked at 400 images while wearing a cap decorated with sensors that record the brain’s electrical activity. The resulting brain prints, which included the neural activity produced in response to celebs, foodstuffs, vocabulary, and some repetitive visual patterns, allowed the researchers to recognize each and every participant with no slipups.

Brain prints would beat fingerprints because fingerprints can be borrowed or stolen. Whereas no one can on Earth can ever know, much less replicate, exactly how your brain reacts when you see the word “mammoth” and pictures of mushrooms and Miley Cyrus.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe