New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Reindeer Spit Smacks Down Plant Toxins

Compounds in reindeer and moose saliva interfere with the production of toxins in plants that ordinarily stop animals from dining on the vegetation. Karen Hopkin reports

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Reindeer spit is in the news. Well, now it is. You see, reindeer and moose eat plants that contain toxins entrusted with keeping the vegetation from being so desirable. But now we know that the animals’ saliva can prevent the production of those toxins. The slick finding is in the journal Biology Letters. [Andrew J. Tanentzap, Mark Vicari and Dawn R. Bazely Ungulate saliva inhibits a grass–endophyte mutualism]
 
Generally speaking, plants do not like to be eaten. And many have defenses to avoid this fate. The red fescue that’s favored by European reindeer and moose maintains a mutually beneficial relationship with a fungus. When the host plant gets munched on, the resident fungus churns out a toxin called ergovaline. This chemical restricts blood flow to the grazer’s extremities, which can lead to the loss of limbs.
 
But the battle doesn’t end there. Because researchers found that when reindeer and moose drool is dribbled over plants, ergovaline production goes way down. 
 
The specific secret of the spit is still unsolved. But the researchers think that compounds in the saliva interfere with the chemical signals that switch on toxin production when the plants get ‘et. One thing they know for sure: as they write in their report, and who can argue, the “salivary secretions of large mammals are more important than previously realized.”
 
—Karen Hopkin
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe