New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Smog Casts a Shadow on China's Solar Farms

The wintertime smog in China's northeastern provinces is so severe it blocks more than 20 percent of sunlight from reaching the region's solar panels. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

China is notorious for its heavy smog. "It's incredibly bad." Denise Mauzerall, an atmospheric scientist at Princeton. "The air pollution in eastern China can be so bad you can't clearly see across the street. It can feel like you're walking through a heavy fog that's burning your lungs."

But smog has other damaging effects too. Mauzerall and her team have found that in winter months the smog in China's northeastern provinces is so severe it blocks more than 20 percent of sunlight from reaching the region's solar panels.

The findings, based on satellite data and photovoltaic performance models, are in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Xiaoyuan Li et al., Reduction of solar photovoltaic resources due to air pollution in China]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One solution to the problem might be installing even more solar. "There's this virtuous cycle—whereas if you use more solar electricity, you can reduce your use of coal. And that will reduce the air pollution levels, and that will then allow you to generate more solar electricity."

China hopes to harvest 10 percent of its electricity from solar by 2030. They'll need 400 gigawatts, or about 10 times what we have installed in the U.S. today. It's an optimistic forecast for solar… and hopefully, for China's air quality, too.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe