New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Star Systems Can Be Born Topsy-Turvy

Astronomers observed an odd triple-star system that offers clues about misaligned planetary orbits. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Artist’s rendering (left) of GW Orionis, which was imaged by an instrument of the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (right).

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Our solar system is far from the only way to put together stars and their planets.

“If you look at all the stars in our galaxy, in the Milky Way, more than half of the stars are formed in multiples—meaning there’s more than one star in the system.”

Astrophysicist Jaehan Bae of the Carnegie Institution for Science. He has studied one of those systems—with three stars. It’s called GW Orionis. And it’s freshly formed—only a million years old. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Yeah, it’s really, really young. It’s a baby.”

Bae says if you translate that million-year life span to that of a human, it’s the equivalent of a week-old baby. And how many week-old babies do you bump into?

“So if you just walk around your neighborhood, there’s little chance you meet a baby who’s one week old. So, first of all, it’s hard to find these systems—they’re pretty rare.”

Bae and his colleagues got lucky spotting this one. Using radio telescopes, they were able to image the star system. And they say it differs from our own solar system in more than just star count. 

In our solar system, for example, all eight planets orbit the sun more or less in a single plane. Think of the sun as the center of a vinyl record—with the planets strung out along the grooves. 

In contrast, Bae’s team discovered that the stars in this triple-star system are ringed by clouds of dust in multiple warped and misaligned planes—picture a three-dimensional gyroscope rather than a two-dimensional vinyl record. The observations are in the journal Science. [Stefan Kraus et al., A triple-star system with a misaligned and warped circumstellar disk shaped by disk tearing]

Those rings of dust will presumably go on to form planets as the star system matures. And Bae says astronomers have indeed observed other, more mature star systems—with planets orbiting in these misaligned planes.

“And we wanted to understand if that happens when the planets are born or whether it’s some evolutionary thing that happens over, you know, a billion years.”

The finding suggests that weirdly aligned planetary systems are born that way—and that stars and their embryonic planets can be all topsy-turvy—even in their infancy. 

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe