Star Systems Can Be Born Topsy-Turvy

Astronomers observed an odd triple-star system that offers clues about misaligned planetary orbits. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Artist’s rendering (left) of GW Orionis, which was imaged by an instrument of the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (right).

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Our solar system is far from the only way to put together stars and their planets.

“If you look at all the stars in our galaxy, in the Milky Way, more than half of the stars are formed in multiples—meaning there’s more than one star in the system.”

Astrophysicist Jaehan Bae of the Carnegie Institution for Science. He has studied one of those systems—with three stars. It’s called GW Orionis. And it’s freshly formed—only a million years old. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Yeah, it’s really, really young. It’s a baby.”

Bae says if you translate that million-year life span to that of a human, it’s the equivalent of a week-old baby. And how many week-old babies do you bump into?

“So if you just walk around your neighborhood, there’s little chance you meet a baby who’s one week old. So, first of all, it’s hard to find these systems—they’re pretty rare.”

Bae and his colleagues got lucky spotting this one. Using radio telescopes, they were able to image the star system. And they say it differs from our own solar system in more than just star count. 

In our solar system, for example, all eight planets orbit the sun more or less in a single plane. Think of the sun as the center of a vinyl record—with the planets strung out along the grooves. 

In contrast, Bae’s team discovered that the stars in this triple-star system are ringed by clouds of dust in multiple warped and misaligned planes—picture a three-dimensional gyroscope rather than a two-dimensional vinyl record. The observations are in the journal Science. [Stefan Kraus et al., A triple-star system with a misaligned and warped circumstellar disk shaped by disk tearing]

Those rings of dust will presumably go on to form planets as the star system matures. And Bae says astronomers have indeed observed other, more mature star systems—with planets orbiting in these misaligned planes.

“And we wanted to understand if that happens when the planets are born or whether it’s some evolutionary thing that happens over, you know, a billion years.”

The finding suggests that weirdly aligned planetary systems are born that way—and that stars and their embryonic planets can be all topsy-turvy—even in their infancy. 

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe