New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Subtle Ancient Footprints Come to Light

Ground-penetrating radar can detect tiny density differences that lead to images of ancient footprints impossible to discern by eye.

Three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar (GPR) perspective of mammoth track, along with human and sloth tracks. The presence of sloth tracks was not known prior to the GPR survey and was later confirmed.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Fossil footprints help tell us how ancient people lived. But such physical impressions are hard to find.

“You get all of these footprints from different species in the same time period interacting, and you can’t see them all the time. And some of them, you can never see—with the eye, that is. But we can we can still detect them with geophysical sensors.”

Cornell University archaeologist Thomas Urban. He and colleagues used ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to detect invisible traces of footsteps in White Sands National Monument in New Mexico. Their GPR device goes back and forth over an area in a grid pattern, which ultimately creates a 2-D radargram. The technique detects subtle differences in ground density.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Speaking about one set of otherwise imperceptible animal’s footprints, he says:

“These were caused by compression of sediment beneath the animal’s track. And they relate to the weight and momentum of the animal.”

Twelve thousand years ago, the White Sands area was a large, muddy flat, which was covered with footprints from various species. Urban is excited about the stories so many footsteps suggest. For example, the researchers found no evidence of shoes or sandals. They did find human and animal tracks crossing each other—which suggests the prints were left during a hunt.

The findings are in the journal Scientific Reports. [Thomas M. Urban et al, 3-D radar imaging unlocks the untapped behavioral and biomechanical archive of Pleistocene ghost tracks]

“This sort of unique setting has recorded all of the daily movements of people. They are actually more than we even thought because there are always some that aren’t visible.”

These techniques could be applied to older sites all around the world, perhaps even to find dinosaur tracks that have been sitting quietly—waiting, at long last, to be found.

—Eliene Augenbraun

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Eliene Augenbraun is a multimedia science producer, formerly Nature Research's Multimedia Managing Editor and Scientific American's senior video producer. Before that, she founded and ran ScienCentral, an award-winning news service providing ABC and NBC with science news stories. She has a PhD in Biology.

More by Eliene Augenbraun

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe