Targeting Certain Brain Cells Can Switch Off Pain

By turning off certain brain cells, researchers were able to make mice sense painful stimuli—but not the associated discomfort. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pain. It’s unpleasant. But what if pain could be rendered less…painful…emotionally speaking? Such uncoupling might not be entirely farfetched. Because researchers have located a set of neurons that seem to encode the feelings of hurt that accompany pain. 

“Pain is both a sensory and emotional experience.”

Grégory Scherrer, a pain expert at Stanford University.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Much of the research so far has focused on the sensory aspect of pain perception. And in particular how cells in our nerves are able to detect the stimuli that we perceive as painful.”

But less is known about why most of us find pain so distressing. 

So Scherrer and his colleagues set out to first identify those brain cells that are active when an animal experiences pain. The researchers used a miniature microscope to look at the brains of living mice. That technology was developed by Mark Schnitzer, who does neuroscience and applied physics at Stanford.

“This microscope is small and light enough that it can be worn on the head of an adult mouse as the animal behaves in a natural manner.”  

When these microscope-wearing mice were poked with a pin or exposed to mild heat or cold, cells in a subregion of their amygdalas lit up. 

“So this indicated that there’s a particular type of cell in a given region of the brain that seemed to specifically encode the percept of pain.”

But are these cells responsible for sensing pain…or interpreting the sensation? To find out, the researchers shut the cells down. And they poked the animals again.

“So when we did that, what we observed is that while animals were still withdrawing from the stimulus, indicating that they could detect it, so the sensation aspect of pain was intact, they didn’t seem to care about the stimulus.”

That is, they didn’t make any effort to avoid the place where they experienced the discomfort…which is how mice usually react to pain. The findings are in the journal Science. [Gregory Corder et al., An amygdalar neural ensemble that encodes the unpleasantness of pain]

A future part of treating pain therefore could be to target these particular neurons. You’d still have the physical part of the pain. But the negative perception of the pain could be diminished.  Which means: still pain, but also gain.

—Karen Hopkin 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe