That Mouse in Your House—It’s Smarter, Thanks to You

Scientists studied three varieties of house mice and found that those who had lived alongside humans the longest were also the craftiest at solving food puzzles. Christopher Intagliata reports.

House mouse (Mus musculus) eating cheese from a trap. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you’ve ever hosted a mouse as a houseguest, you know they can be incredibly clever at finding your food. And that makes sense. 

“They had to become better in traits like problem solving because we became better at hiding our food from them.”

Anja Guenther is with the Max Planck Institute in Germany. She says that battle of the minds has made mice craftier over time. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The longer the mice lived with humans, the better they are at problem-solving.”

You see, there are more than a dozen subspecies of house mice worldwide. And each began cohabitating with humans at different times in our evolutionary history. For example ...

Mus musculus domesticus.”

It began raiding human pantries around 12,000 years ago.

Mus musculus musculus.

Our relationship with them began some 8,000 years ago.

“And Mus musculus castaneus.”

It’s a relative newcomer who began cohabitating only 3,000 to 5,000 years ago. 

And that spread in evolutionary life histories, with constituents from all three groups, gave Guenther’s team an opportunity. They gathered 150 mice—representing all three groups—and tested them with seven different food puzzles. Each puzzle was baited with a mealworm, which the mice could only get by pushing or pulling a lid, for example, or extracting a ball of paper from a tube or opening the window of a Lego house.

And they found that the longer a mouse variety had lived with humans, the more likely it was to solve these food puzzles.

“So, basically, what we are left at, with trying to explain these results that we see, is that the mice really developed higher enhanced cognitive abilities while living with humans.”

The results appear in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [Lara Vrbanec et al., Enhanced problem-solving ability as an adaptation to urban environments in house mice]

As the human footprint on the globe expands, Guenther says it’s more important than ever to understand how we influence animal minds to learn why some creatures, like housemice, adapt—while others simply die out.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe