Tourist Photographs Help African Wildlife Census

Photographs snapped by safari tourists are a surprisingly accurate way to assess populations of African carnivores. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tracking wildlife is a tough job. Take the case of a one-eared leopard named Pavarotti. For this guy: <“Nessun Dorma” clip> “He was a very big beautiful male, and he had a very, very deep, deep roar, and so they named him after Pavarotti.” 

Kasim Rafiq, a wildlife biologist at Liverpool John Moores University.

“So I used to get up at the crack of dawn, follow his tracks and try and find him. It’d been a few months since I'd seen him. One day, I went out, and I was looking for him. His tracks took me off road through this woodland area....” 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Before he knew it, the wheel of his Land Rover was stuck in a warthog burrow. He wasted several hours getting out. Then, on the way back to camp, he bumped into some local tour guides and their safari guests, who’d had better luck spotting Pavarotti. 

“Basically, they laughed and explained that they’d seen him that morning.” 

Rafiq then realized that tourist wildlife sightings might be an untapped source of information about wild animals.

So he and his team worked with a safari lodge in Botswana to analyze 25,000 tourist photographs of wildlife. They used those as sightings of lions, spotted hyenas, leopards, cheetahs and wild dogs. They then compared those data to the estimates they made with traditional wildlife biology tactics: camera traps, track surveys, and “call-in stations”—where they play sounds of distressed animals in the middle of the night and see who pops by. 

Turned out that the estimates from tourist photos were just as good as those gleaned from traditional methods. And the tourists were actually the only ones to see elusive cheetahs—the researchers would have missed the cats without the citizen science data. The results are in the journal Current Biology. [Kasim Rafiq et al., Tourist photographs as a scalable framework for wildlife monitoring in protected areas]

The idea is not to put wildlife researchers out of a job. "“The reality is there’s so many interesting things we still have to find out about these large carnivores and so many conservation projects that need to be carried out that we don’t have the time or resources to do them all.”

And tourist photos might help make sure that all the local carnivores are spotted.

—Christopher Intagliata 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe