New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Utah's Deserts Are Bee Hotspots 

The Trump administration is shrinking Utah's desert monuments, stripping some federal protections for wild pollinators. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Small and large carpenter bees (Ceratina and Xylocopa, respectively) visit a wild rose in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

 

More than 20 years ago, President Bill Clinton stood on the south rim of the Grand Canyon, announcing his intention to set aside nearly two million acres of Utah land. Land that his proclamation said was home to, quote, "many different vegetative communities and numerous types of endemic plants and their pollinators."

Just how many pollinators was an open question at the time. So, a handful of intrepid entomologists set out, season after season, to observe and classify wild bees in every corner of the monument… and they got 660 of them. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"So 660 bees represents about half the species known in Utah, and about one fifth of the species known from the United States." Joseph Wilson, an entomologist at Utah State University involved in the efforts. "So there's a big proportion of the bees known from North America are found in the Grand Staircase National Monument."

But then, he says, just as they were publishing those big results, his team got word the Trump administration was going to shrink the monument to half its size

So they reanalyzed their data in light of the new maps. And found that the new monument left 84 of the 660 wild bee species outside its bounds. "So what does it mean for these 84 species now that they're no longer in these protected lands? We really don't know."

Their analysis—and maps of the monument and its bees—are in the journal PeerJ. [Joseph S. Wilson et al., Reducing protected lands in a hotspot of bee biodiversity: bees of Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument]

"One of our main goals is just to make people aware that this area is a hotspot of bee diversity and that pollinators, including all of these native bees, should probably be considered as management plans for these areas get developed."

Just as they were considered in the monument's creation.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe