New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Vaccine Aims at Fly Host of Disease Parasite

An experimental leishmaniasis vaccine relies on eliciting an immune response to a protein from the saliva of the sand fly that carries the leishmania parasite, rather than on anything from the parasite itself. Cynthia Graber reports

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Leishmaniasis is a sometimes fatal disease marked by skin ulcers, fever, and spleen and liver problems. It currently affects about 12 million people, mostly in the developing world, with about 2 million new infections annually. It’s caused by a parasite, which is spread by sand flies.

There is not yet a good vaccine against leishmaniasis. But researchers have shown that it may be worthwhile to target not the parasite—but its fly host. The report good results in non-human primates in the journal Science Translational Medicine. [Fabiano Oliveira et al, A sand fly salivary protein vaccine shows efficacy against vector-transmitted cutaneous leishmaniasis in nonhuman primates]

Vaccines usually trigger our immune systems to rally against a pathogenic agent. If that agent should actually show up, the immune system can disarm it.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But in this case, scientists aimed at the carrier—the sand fly. When an infected fly bites a victim, it injects parasites and its own saliva. So the researchers subjected monkeys to repeated bites from uninfected sand flies, then to bites from infected sandflies. And the monkeys bitten first by uninfected flies were partially protected when confronted with the leishmaniasis parasite. Seems that exposure to fly saliva alone could elicit an immune response.

The researchers then determined that one particular protein in the sand fly’s saliva kicked the immune system into action. A vaccine based on that protein offered partial protection, with 7 of 10 monkeys that got it developing smaller ulcers and a stronger immune response than their unvaccinated peers when infected with the parasite.

This protein can be generated and purified easily from E. coli, which means that it’s possible to get large quantities of it to produce a potential future human vaccine against leishmaniasis. Which would make this saliva-based protection nothing to spit at.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe