Parasite's Plant Genes Could Be Achilles' Heel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sleeping sickness parasite kills nearly 66,000 people annually and silently infects almost 450,000 more, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa. Current drug treatments are wanting because they work best in the disease's initial stages, when diagnosis is often difficult. New research published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences may help identify alternate pharmaceutical strategies. The study results suggest that the parasite contains algae genes, and thus could succumb to drugs based on herbicides.

Fred R. Opperdoes of the Christian de Duve Institute of Cellular Pathology in Belgium and his colleagues analyzed the genomes of two types of trypanosomatids, the group of bugs behind sleeping sickness, Chagas' disease and leishmaniasis. The team found that the genomes of Trypanosoma brucei (see image) and Leishmania mexicana contain 16 genes closely related to genes found in plants. The corresponding plant genes contribute to photosynthesis. Trypanosomatids lack the ability to photosynthesis but the scientists did detect proteins produced by these genes in the microbes' glycosomes, which help them extract energy from food. The researchers thus posit that a small algal organism used to live inside trypanosomatids, and was eliminated by evolution save for some of its genes.

The findings could point to new ways to combat parasitic diseases, the authors conclude, because the effects of a variety of agricultural herbicides on trypanosomes and leishmaniasis can easily be tested.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe