Yes, We Cancun on Climate Change?

After Copenhagen, the world reconvenes to try to combat climate change. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Last year in Copenhagen, international negotiations to combat climate change fractured. And the rifts have not healed. Developing countries want recognition of the long history of greenhouse gas pollution by developed nations. And they remain skeptical of the Copenhagen Accord. Small island states and others on the frontlines of the consequences of climate change want hard targets and the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol. And the U.S. stands alone, not least because even the promises it has made in the past are unmatched by any domestic legislation to cut carbon dioxide.

At least the negotiations are happening in balmy Cancun, right?

Actually, progress of sorts is being made. Chinese and Indian negotiators have indicated a willingness to consider international monitoring and verification of greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Developed countries have begun to lay out a plan for funding technology transfer and adaptation efforts. There might even be an agreement to stop deforestation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But, the landmark Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012 and even Japan—the country that gave it its name—opposes renewing it. That's probably okay given that some countries that signed it ultimately ignored their commitment. Ahem, Canada.

Whatever comes out of Cancun at the end of this coming week, as UN climate chief Christiana Figueres noted at the conference, it is no doubt "pathetically insufficient" compared to what's needed to begin to slow and reverse climate change. And the temperature keeps rising.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe