Great Lakes Fish Are Moving North with Climate Change. But Can They Adapt Fast Enough?

The first fish came to the Great Lakes after glacial retreat created them thousands of years ago. Now those fish are on the move again.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Karen Alofs: I think it’s important to realize that fish, like many other species, are adapting to climate change and that we don’t yet fully understand the consequences.

I became an ecologist because I was interested in studying something that I could see, that I could go outside and then I could see in the environment.

And over time, I've become more and more aware of the perils for biodiversity. I've studied species invasions and climate change and habitat destruction. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have a really diverse set of fish in the Great Lakes, over 150 native fishes, that these fishes evolved elsewhere, but colonized the Great Lakes given the opportunity of the retreat of the glaciers. 

And that these fish are threatened by changes to their habitat. They’re threatened by new species invasions and establishment.

And that humans can have a lot of impact on preserving that biodiversity. 

The area where the Great Lakes are now was covered by more than a mile of ice. 

Around 14,00 to 9,000 years ago, the Great Lakes were formed as the glaciers retreated and melted, leaving these large, ecologically empty areas that fishes colonized. 

These fish moved northward, eastward, and westward and colonized the Great Lakes.

Through rivers that we don't have anymore through lakes that we don't have anymore… into these newly formed lakes that were ecologically open, that had habitat and new food resources. 

My research in Ontario as a postdoc was looking at changes in the distribution of freshwater fish. 

I was interested in whether these fish were moving poleward with warming temperatures.

I was able to use a combination of museum records and records from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and forestry surveys to show that fishes that are warm water adapted like bass, largemouth bass, and smallmouth bass, were actually moving north and establishing in lakes that were really too cold for them in the past, but were warming up.

But the process of colonizing the Great Lakes was somewhat different.

It was over thousands of years that these fish moved. It’s similar, in that it was the warming of the climate over a longer period of time.

But it’s very different in terms of the interactions with other species, and what we might think of as ecological opportunity. 

In that the Great Lakes were open, that they had these ecological niches, habitat, and prey availability, that these fish could easily move into. And that's not necessarily the case as species expand their ranges or move north to track climate.

For freshwater fish, there’s a lot of risk today. There are many stressors that are interacting and impacting freshwater fish biodiversity. 

And I hope that by understanding how these impacts are changing fish communities, we can actually improve conservation and management and fisheries that provide resources that humans rely upon for food and for sport.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe