June 26, 2015

Multitasking Can Improve Exercise Performance

Researchers were surprised to find that cyclists rode faster while taking on easy mental tasks.

—Karen Hopkin, Eliene Augenbraun

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you’re like me, you know that multitasking does not always save time. You slow down or make mistakes that require fixing. But maybe I’m just doing the wrong things.

This is Scientific American's 60-Second Science. I'm Karen Hopkin. This will just take a minute.

A new study shows that people on a stationary bike pedaled faster when they simultaneously tackled some sort of mental test.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Even the researchers were surprised by that result. They had originally set out to demonstrate what other studies have shown—that when people try to do two things at once, they do both more poorly. Their counterintuitive finding is in the journal PLoS ONE. [Lori J. P. Altmann et al, Unexpected Dual Task Benefits on Cycling in Parkinson Disease and Healthy Adults: A Neuro-Behavioral Model]

In the experiment, subjects were asked to complete various cognitive jobs that ranged in difficulty—everything from saying “go” when they saw a blue star on a projection screen to remembering a long list of numbers and then repeating them back in reverse order. They tackled these tasks once while sitting in a quiet room and again while on the bike.

Turns out, cyclists rode 25 percent faster when they were distracted by some mental gymnastics—but only when the tasks were relatively easy. When confronted with tough brainteasers, their cycling speeds were about the same as when they had nothing in particular to think about. And in case you’re wondering, the participants’ cycling neither helped nor hindered their brain function.

The findings could point toward new programs in which we get better workouts simply by using our heads.

Thanks for the minute! For Scientific American's 60-Second Science, I'm Karen Hopkin.

—Karen Hopkin

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American